<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"

	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"

	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>The E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse Bureau Fellowship</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/</link>
<description>Student produced content from the Statehouse Bureau Fellowship program at the E.W. Scripps School of Journalism at Ohio University.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<generator>graphic reactor 2.3</generator>
<item>
<title>Amusement rides injure 4,000 kids each year, study finds</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=399</link>
<dc:creator>By Ryan Clark (ryanclark@dispatch.com)
The Columbus Dispatch</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=399</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As summer draws near, children will soon be freed from classrooms and will flock to amusement parks, festivals and fairs. But what they and their parents might not know is that more than 4,000 children nationwide visit emergency rooms each year because of injuries on amusement rides, according to a study released yesterday by researchers from the Center for Injury Research and Policy at Nationwide Children’s Hospital.

The study estimated that 92,885 children younger than 18 were injured between 1990 and 2010. It did not include injuries from inflatable rides, such as bounce houses, or from water parks. About 70 percent of the injuries occurred annually between May and September, when children generally are not in school.

But in Ohio, ride owners, manufacturers and state inspectors work throughout the year to try to prevent injuries. Some experts say the state has one of the best amusement-ride safety programs in the country. Others say more is needed, such as federal oversight.Researchers wanted to take a better look at amusement-ride injuries because little detailed information was available, said Dr. Gary Smith, senior author of the study and director of the center at Children’s.

The study found that head and neck injuries were the most common and that falling in, on, off or against a ride was the most-common way injuries occurred.

Rides at amusement parks such as Kings Island and Cedar Point were responsible for about 34 percent of the injuries nationwide. Mobile rides typically found at carnivals and fairs accounted for about 29 percent of injuries, and about 12 percent occurred on rides at malls, stores, restaurants or arcades. The location was not known in the remaining cases, partly because of incomplete records.

Ohio has about 3,900 fixed and mobile rides that are inspected annually by the state’s Division of Amusement Ride Safety, which is part of the Ohio Department of Agriculture. It also inspects inflatable rides and water parks. But rides in malls and stores, such as coin-operated rides and mini-trains, are not inspected.

“You typically hear about injuries on roller coasters and the big rides, but we knew there was a much bigger picture,” Smith said. “A lot of children get injured at carnivals, local arcades and on coin-operated rides.”

The study used data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System, which provides information about injuries treated in a selection of hospital emergency rooms throughout the country. Researchers used that data to estimate total injuries.

Injuries treated in locations other than emergency rooms, such as urgent-care centers, would not have been counted.

The study’s limitations emphasize the need to have a national group collect data and create and enforce standards for rides throughout the country, Smith said.

In Ohio, for instance, only injuries that require an overnight stay in a hospital are investigated by the state and made public. Records of other injuries — from scraped knees to broken bones — are kept by the ride owners.

Industry groups and manufacturers often will share information with one another about problems and how to prevent them, but federal oversight is needed, said Ken Martin, an industry consultant and inspector in Richmond, Va.

“We all need to be singing the same hymn, on the same verse and to the same beat,” Martin said. “ It’s a shame because the public suffers.”

The lack of public information about amusement-ride accidents has motivated some people to create websites — including rideaccidents.com and saferparks.org — to share information about ride safety.

Smith said the Children’s study also was intended to educate people.

For example, about three-quarters of injuries on mall rides occurred because children fell off them, the study found. That information can be used to prevent future injuries by installing better restraints or putting padding around the rides, he said.

“Overall, rides are safe,” Smith said. “But I think we can do much better.”

Industry experts say safety is their priority. The International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions estimates that the odds of being seriously injured on a ride are 1 in 24 mil-lion. Almost 300 million people visit the 400-some amusement parks in the nation and take almost 2 billion safe rides every year, the association says.

“You take more of a risk in your car driving on the freeway to Cedar Point than you do riding a ride at Cedar Point,” said Monty Jasper, the corporate vice president of safety and engineering at Cedar Fairs Entertainment Co., which owns the Sandusky park and also Kings Island.The industry is motivated to ensure safety for riders because people won’t spend their money if the rides aren’t safe, Jasper said. “If we get in trouble, the market will punish us. The legal system will punish us. The state sometimes is a lesser of our worries.”

Ohio’s amusement-ride safety division investigated seven serious injuries from amusement rides in Ohio last year. The ratio of registered rides to serious accidents is “minimal,” said Mike Vartorella, the assistant chief of the division and chief state inspector.

“Any injury is one too many,” said Bill Avery, an industry consultant and inspector from Maitland, Fla. “The person riding to the hospital doesn’t care about the statistics.”

But injuries will always be part of amusement rides because the rides are mechanical and operated by people who make mistakes, Avery said. “Nothing is really truly safe, only reasonably safe. And the numbers show me the industry is reasonably safe.”

In Ohio, amusement-ride owners and manufacturers and state inspectors work together to ensure rider safety.

When designing a ride, engineers ensure that restraints will keep people in their seats and that acceleration and other forces are within safe levels.

Owners inspect rides daily, and state officials inspect every ride at least once a year.

At Kings Island in Mason, for example, state workers inspected the Beast on April 18 before the park opened on April 27. They checked all the roller coaster’s wooden supports and walked the more than 7,000 feet of track looking for imperfections in the metal track or the boards that support it.

Inspectors also check to make sure the ride meets its manufacturer’s specifications.If problems are found, the ride cannot open until they are fixed and the division is notified. However, inspectors do not recheck the ride after repairs have been completed.

Kings Island’s maintenance crews also inspect every ride daily before the park opens, said Doug Kramer, who is the head of fire and safety for the park and chairman of the state’s advisory board to the Division of Amusement Ride Safety.

“It’s not like we flip a switch on in the morning and are ready to ride,” Kramer said.

<i>Ryan Clark is a fellow in Ohio University's E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau. Follow him on Twitter @RyanGClark.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-05-02T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gel manicures carry small risk</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=398</link>
<dc:creator>By Sara Jerde (sjerde@dispatch.com)
The Columbus Dispatch</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=398</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Some women prefer gel manicures to traditional polish because the gel process lasts longer and chips less. But there are concerns about the drying process, which uses ultraviolet lamps to cure the polish — it’s basically a tanning bed for your fingers — and also about the way the gel is removed.

Dr. Shannon Trotter, a dermatologist with the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital, said moderation is key. “We don’t know the risk, but we do advise to protect hands.”The ultraviolet lamps slightly increase the risk of skin cancer. “It’s not zero percent, but it’s quite low,” Trotter said.

The manicure is more expensive than a traditional one — typically about $40 — and curing the gel requires about 30 seconds under a low-level UV lamp.Trotter suggests that women wait longer between applications and apply sunscreen, lay a towel over their hands or cut finger holes in a pair of gloves.

“It’s just like alcohol — if you drink a bit, it’s OK,” said Stephanie Nguyen, manager of Luxe Nail Spa in Upper Arlington. “There are a lot of bad things, but in small doses, it’s not so bad.”&amp; amp; amp; amp; lt; /p>

What might be more harmful is the removal process, said Dr. Chris Adigun, a New York University dermatologist.

At an American Academy of Dermatology conference last month, Adigun said that removing the gel requires soaking in an acetone solution for at least 10 minutes. She said that can make nails dry and brittle.

“I wouldn’t tell a patient to stop getting gel manicures,” she said. “I just advise them to be mindful and be aware before having a new manicure put on.”

Tina Falasca, 40, of Upper Arlington, said she gets gel manicures every two to three weeks. She puts sunscreen on her hands before each manicure.

“I love them,” Falasca said. “My nails always look like I just came from a nail salon.”

<i>Sara Jerde is a fellow in Ohio University’s E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-28T17:04:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ex-legislator Carey named state’s higher-ed chancellor</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=397</link>
<dc:creator>By Ryan Clark (ryanclark@dispatch.com)
The Columbus Dispatch</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=397</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Gov. John Kasich named a former state representative to lead Ohio’s higher-education system yesterday, saying his “job-creation mindset” will further the governor’s plans for the state’s economy.

John Carey, a Republican from Wellston, was appointed chancellor of the Ohio Board of Regents, which oversees higher education. Carey will succeed Jim Petro, who retired on Feb. 1. Carey is expected to focus on Kasich’s goal of increasing jobs in Ohio.

“I think it’s great,” Petro said. “He has all the background to address the key issues affecting higher education.”

Carey spent 17 years in the state legislature — including time as chairman of both the House and Senate finance committees — before stepping down in 2011 to lobby for Shawnee State University in southern Ohio.

As chancellor, Carey said, he plans to work with businesses to match their needs with the preparation that students receive in college.

That will provide opportunities to students and make Ohio more prosperous, Carey said.

“It’s a culture change,” he said. “We want to provide opportunities for students to have a choice — to choose an education and career that will benefit themselves the most.”

Carey, 54, graduated from Ohio University in 1981 with a degree in political science.

The chancellor is the director of the Board of Regents and a member of the governor’s cabinet. With input from the nine-member board, the chancellor provides policy advice to the governor and the legislature and carries out higher-education policy. Each state university is directly governed by its own board of trustees, though the chancellor and regents can make recommendations.

Carey will take office on Monday, pending Ohio Senate approval. His salary has not yet been set, said the governor’s spokesman, Rob Nichols. Petro earned $174,601 a year.

<i>Ryan Clark is a fellow in Ohio University’s E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau. Follow him on Twitter @RyanGClark.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-25T14:27:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Doctors’ apologies can’t be used against them in malpractice suits, justices rule</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=391</link>
<dc:creator>By Sara Jerde (sjerde@dispatch.com)
The Columbus Dispatch</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=391</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[An apology or other sympathetic statements health-care officials make to their patients can’t be used as evidence of liability in medical-malpractice cases. Lawmakers enacted this years ago.

The Supreme Court of Ohio clarified yesterday that this information can’t be used in cases filed after the “medical apology statute” legislation took effect on Sept. 13, 2004, even if the treatment occurred before then.

“Doctors admitting that he did something wrong — that could be huge. That could be a large piece of evidence,” said Dan Abraham, attorney and part-owner of Colley Shroyer &amp; Abraham, a Columbus association of trial attorneys that specializes in medical-malpractice cases.

But these emotionally charged conversations don’t belong in court testimony, argued Dr. William Wulf, medical director of Central Ohio Primary Care.

“Physicians are and should be sympathetic and empathetic. Fear of future legal action shouldn’t impede that,” Wulf said.

Yesterday’s Supreme Court decision was prompted by a medical-malpractice case that accused Dr. Randall Smith, a general surgeon from Portage County, of admitting his guilt to causing complications after removing Jeanette Johnson’s gall bladder.

The Johnsons first filed their original suit in 2002, months after Smith allegedly said, “I take full responsibility for this. Everything will be okay.”

The couple voluntarily forfeited the case in 2006, but re-filed a complaint in July 2007.

But because the case was filed three years after the legislation passed, the apology couldn’t be used in testimony, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday.

The clarification reversed a Court of Appeals ruling.

The Ohio State Medical Association plans to push for a bill to clarify the apology statute, the organization wrote in a news release yesterday.

“(The association) applauds the court’s opinion and views it as a common-sense application of a law that is clearly written with unambiguous intent.”

<i>Sara Jerde is a fellow in Ohio University’s E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau. Follow her on Twitter @SaraJerde.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-24T11:35:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hamilton Co. magnet for out-of-county workers</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=392</link>
<dc:creator>By Lance Lambert (llambert@enquirer.com)
The Cincinnati Enquirer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=392</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Every working day, more than 110,000 commuters from outside Hamiton County head into the county than people leave the county for work elsewhere.

That finding from recently released commuting pattern data underscores another truth: Hamilton County, despite the growth of suburban areas around it, remains the Cincinnati region’s economic driver. Economists and demographers say it’s likely to stay that way, too.

For example, Hamilton County draws 2.2 commuters from Butler and Warren counties for every 1 commuter who leaves Hamilton for each of those counties, according to an Enquirer analysis of recently released American Community Survey estimates on commuting from 2006 to 2010.

What’s the draw? Jobs, especially high-paying ones. Hamilton County only has a little more than a third of the 15-county region’s population, yet it held more than half the jobs and total payroll in the region, reveals another set of Census data (on county business patterns in 2010).

Nearly 40 percent of Hamilton County’s jobs are held by people who live elsewhere. The high number of commuters “makes up for the county’s population decline,” said Gary Wright, a demographer and founder of Wright Futures in Cincinnati.

“As long as we have large employers downtown such as Kroger, P&amp;G, Macy’s, and Great American, to name just a few, Hamilton County will remain the primary economic engine of the region,” said Janet Harrah, the senior director at the Center for Economic Analysis and Development at Northern Kentucky University. The county also has most of the region’s hospitals and universities, as well as concentrated numbers of lawyers and financial services workers.

Looking deeper into the commuting data, you find that people in the more remote counties in the region are pulled in particular ways.

Boone County is a magnet for Grant County commuters/workers; Campbell attracts folks from Pendleton. Even Clermont County, which is a net loser of commuters to virtually every core county in our region, is a powerful magnet to people in Brown County.

<i>Lance Lambert is a fellow in Ohio University’s E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau. He studies journalism at the University of Cincinnati.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-22T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>And you think your commute is bad</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=393</link>
<dc:creator>By Lance Lambert (llambert@enquirer.com)
The Cincinnati Enquirer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=393</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hamilton County’s economy draw is so strong that more than 3 of every 100 commuters to the county live outside the region, Census estimates released last month show.

An Enquirer analysis of these 16,263 “super commuters” shows about 20 percent of them live in Montgomery County.

In fact, 0.7 percent of the region’s commuters come from a state other than Ohio, Kentucky or Indiana, the estimates from the 2006-2010 American Community Survey reveal.

Super commuters endure one-way trips to the workplace of more than 60 minutes.

Tricia Casey, an administrative manager at Downtown Cincinnati Inc., is one of them. She has commuted from downtown Dayton to downtown Cincinnati for 12 years, the last nine of which have been vanpooling with Rideshare – a carpooling program created by OKI Regional Council of Governments.

“It is very nice to be in company of others,” she said. “Sometimes people will work on their laptops or cell phones, or sleep.”

Prior to vanpooling, Casey was putting 30,000 miles on her car a year and driving 60 miles a day by herself.

“In Cincinnati, you can live 15 minutes from downtown and be in a different county and state,” said John Gallagher, president of the Ohio Section of the Institute of Transportation Engineers. “Metro areas like this will have higher (number of workers) that live outside the county but work in the county, just from the lay of the land.”

Overall, nearly 40 percent of the commuters to Hamilton County don’t live in the county. But while they primarily get here by road, their large number doesn’t necessarily add to county funding for road projects.

“People who don’t live here but work here, their license fees go to their home county, even though they are adding to the traffic volume,” said Tim Gilday, chief deputy engineer for Hamilton County.

<i>Lance Lambert is a fellow in Ohio University’s E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau. He studies journalism at the University of Cincinnati.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-22T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>City workers moving into renovated police headquarters</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=390</link>
<dc:creator>By Ryan Clark (ryanclark@dispatch.com)
The Columbus Dispatch</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=390</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[About 250 city of Columbus employees have begun moving into the former police headquarters after almost $38 million in repairs and renovations modernized the 1929 building.

As they become the building’s first occupants in more than 20 years, the employees are often greeted with examples of old meeting new.

In the halls, high-efficiency lights shine on the original orange marble paneling, and towering glass walls now extend past the brick-and-mortar walls of the building’s east face. “We’re trying to respect history,” said Dave Bush, the assistant director of finance and management.

The city has spent about $33.7 million since July 2011 to renovate the five-story building at 77 N. Front St. into office space for six city departments. In 2000, to stop the building from deteriorating, the city council approved spending about $4 million for new windows, a new roof, asbestos removal and some other limited renovations.

The building had been vacant since 1991, when police moved to their current headquarters in a newly built eight-story tower next door.

“The building was pretty beat up,” Bush said. “Through neglect, it was falling down.”

Among the updates: Keycard pads restrict movement throughout the building, and a tunnel linking it and City Hall was rebuilt. Lighting, heating and cooling improvements meet or exceed efficiency standards. The glass-walled extension on the east provides about 30,000 square feet more space and also helps reduce energy costs by allowing in more natural light.

The building will house employees from the city attorney’s office, income-tax division, public safety, human resources, civil service and purchasing.

Planning officials worked with the departments to meet their needs. The city attorney’s office, for example, has sound-insulated rooms for depositions, and civil service has a room with 50 computers for employee testing.

“It’s been wonderful,” said Michael Eccard, the assistant executive director of the civil-service commission, which moved into the new offices about two weeks ago. “Having all of our offices on one floor has been a huge benefit to us.”

Civil-service employees previously worked on different floors in the Beacon Building across Front Street at 50 W. Gay St.

As the city is moving employees into the building, it is shuffling others in order to vacate the offices nearby at 109 N. Front St., which should be demolished by the end of the year. The city council has allocated funds for the design of its replacement, which could be completed as early as 2015, Bush said.

<i>Ryan Clark is a fellow in Ohio University’s E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-17T21:39:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lawmakers Review Adjunct Faculty Legislation</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=394</link>
<dc:creator>By Lance Lambert
The News Record</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=394</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Ohio House and Senate are considering legislation to grant adjunct faculty and employed graduate students collective bargaining rights.
In March, Rep. Fred Strahorn (D-Dayton) and Sen. Nina Turner (D-Cleveland) introduced HB 96 and SB 65, identical bills that would give more rights to part-time teaching employees at public higher education institutions.

“Like all Ohioans, adjunct faculty and graduate assistants deserve a fair shake in the workplace,” Turner said in a press release. “They are a pivotal part of the fabric of higher education and need a seat at the table to ensure that they’re being treated fairly.”

Under current Ohio law, part-time teaching employees at public universities are prohibited from forming a union.

“Adjunct faculty and graduate students now comprise the majority of instructors at Ohio’s public institutions of higher education,” said John McNay, president of the Ohio Conference AAUP and history professor at University of Cincinnati Blue Ash College. “Their working conditions are the students’ learning conditions, and we need to ensure that they have the opportunity to speak with a unified voice.”

During McNay’s 13 years as a professor at UC he has seen part-time employees increase, compared to the growth of full-time professors.

UC employs 4,401 instructional teachers, 2,097 of which are part-time employees and 2,304 are full time, according to UC Employee Population Statistics.

It is cheaper for universities to hire part-time employees than it is to hire full-time employees, McNay said.

The Ohio Part-Time Faculty Association is an association lobbying for the bills, and pushing for better benefits and increased pay for adjunct professors.

“One of the issues is the working conditions,” said Maria Maisto, the administrator of OPTFA and board president of the national branch. “Adjunct professors are paid a third of what full-time professors are paid and have limited access to benefits and no meaningful due process and are fired and hired at will.”

Universities are also cutting adjuncts hours to less than 30, so they do not have to offer health insurance and can avoid fines from the Affordable Care Act, Maisto said.

Strahorn originally introduced this bill in 2002 and reintroduced it upon his return to the Ohio General Assembly.

“My bill is about fairness. The people who are doing an increased share of the teaching deserve to have a say in their working conditions,” Straborn said. “It simply says people who have been excluded from collective bargaining should no longer be excluded from that right if they so choose.”

<i>Lance Lambert is a fellow in Ohio University’s E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau. He studies journalism at the University of Cincinnati.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-17T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Medicaid Expansion Budget Halted</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=395</link>
<dc:creator>By Lance Lambert
The News Record</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=395</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Republican-controlled Ohio House of Representatives removed Medicaid expansion from its budget; meaning low-income Ohioans might be without healthcare in the near future.

The house unveiled its two-year budget Tuesday, stripping out Gov. John Kasich’s plan to expand Medicaid, cut taxes on small businesses, expand the state sales tax, and education funding plan.

Kasich included Medicaid expansion in his two-year budget proposal, but has since received backlash from conservative organizations and Ohio Republicans in the House and Senate.

If Ohio voted to expand Medicaid, it would join a growing number of Republican-controlled states to fulfill an option in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to cover individuals living at, or below, 138 percent of the federal poverty level — approximately $15,000 annually for an individual and $32,000 for a family of four.

Medicaid currently covers about 2.2 million Ohioans.

Ohio law currently covers adults with dependents at, or below, 90 percent of the federal poverty level and did not cover adults without dependents. A family of four making $20,000 or below would qualify under current guidelines.

House Speaker William Batchelder, R-Medina, said the proposal isn’t necessarily dead, but Republicans are worried about the uncertainty of future federal funding for the expansion.

Tea Party groups and some conservatives argue the plan would expand the national debt and do not want to support anything related to Obamacare.

Kasich had estimated at least 275,000 Ohioans would be eligible for coverage under the expansion.
Forgoing the expansion means Ohio will pass on $400 million in federal funding next year and more than $13 billion in the next seven years.

“Ohioans will recapture, over the next seven years, $13 billion in our money to help these working poor and those searching for jobs to be able to get healthcare,” Kasich said.

The expansion will save state dollars spent on emergency room visits from patients without healthcare and help rural hospitals.

It is not sustainable for the state to continue to cover emergency rooms and hospital visits for the poort, Kasich said.

Kasich emphasized he is not a supporter of Obamacare, or an individual mandate, but does believe the expansion will help “the working poor.”

The federal government would reimburse 100 percent of the cost of Medicaid expansion for the first three years and then phase down to 90 percent after that.

House Democrats introduced a bill Wednesday that would expand Medicaid, though Republican’s control both the Ohio House and Senate. Fifty votes are required to approve legislation in the Ohio House, Republicans control 60 of the 99 seats.
Last year, the US Supreme Court ruled states have the ability to opt in or out of the program, but cannot partially implement the expansion.

“I think it is very likely the federal government could change the reimbursement rates to states,” said Greg Lawson, statehouse liaison and policy analyst at the Buckeye Institute.

The Obama administration already floated around the proposal of cutting the reimbursement rate before the US Supreme Court ruled that states could opt out, Lawson said.

The Congressional Budget Office Monday announced the national debt would reach $23 trillion by 2023, which will likely put more pressure of the federal government to cut spending, Lawson said.

Kasich said Ohio would “reverse this decision” if the federal government changed the reimbursement rates in a way to make the state pay more for expansion.

If the rates do change, the state will likely be unable to reverse its decision because of political problems resulting from future changes in leadership, Lawson said.

<i>Lance Lambert is a fellow in Ohio University's E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau. He studies journalism at the University of Cincinnati.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-14T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Same-sex marriage debated at OSU</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=389</link>
<dc:creator>By Sara Jerde (sjerde@dispatch.com)
The Columbus Dispatch</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=389</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Last night’s town-hall debate on same-sex marriage began with a question from an audience member, who held up a copy of the Constitution and asked the panelists to explain how marriage equality wasn’t already protected.

In response, Greg Davis, pastor of Southwest Baptist Church in Brunswick, Medina County, and one of last night’s panelists, pointed to his Bible.

“God designed for one man and one woman to marry,” Davis said. “If I’m picking sides, I want to be on God’s and Jesus’ side.”

An “Amen” then rumbled through the crowd, which grew to about 100 people. The debate was hosted by two local TV stations at the Union at Ohio State University.

“He has a license to marry people ... that’s what we’re talking about here — having the marriage recognized by the state of Ohio,” said panelist Ian James and co-founder of FreedomOhio, a group seeking to overturn Ohio’s ban on same-sex marriage.

The ban overwhelmingly passed in 2004, but James said he believes voters will support an amendment to repeal it because the proposed wording allows churches the right to deny performing same-sex marriages.

“The debate was good, but nobody heard anything they haven’t heard before. Everyone has decided how they feel, but the polling numbers and trends show that there is more support, which makes the argument a little more compelling,” said Paul Feeney, 39, of Columbus.

FreedomOhio has until July 3 to gather 385,253 signatures to place the amendment on a 2013 ballot.

James was unable to say how many signatures have been gathered, but he said the group has gotten about 100 signatures per day since U.S. Sen. Rob Portman, a Republican from Ohio, announced his support for same-sex marriage last month. Before that, the average was about 20 signatures per day.

“It shows that the tides have turned,” James said. “The world has changed. People who had a view of what marriage was and was not have so dramatically changed.”

Ken Klukowski, director of the Center for Religious Liberty at the Family Research Council and Elyzabeth Holford, Equality Ohio executive director, also were panelists.

<i>Sara Jerde is a fellow in Ohio University’s E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau. Follow her on Twitter @SaraJerde.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-12T12:12:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pension-board member’s Hawaii trip takes more heat despite testimony</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=387</link>
<dc:creator>By Joshua Jamerson (jjamerson@dispatch.com)
The Columbus Dispatch</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=387</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[To no avail, the Ohio Retirement Council again has urged board members of one of Ohio’s public-pension funds to reconsider travel to Hawaii as well as update its travel policy.
Barbra Phillips, one of two School Employees Retirement System of Ohio board members headed to Hawaii in May for a conference, stood before state lawmakers yesterday for the first time since they called for the trip to be canceled.

Phillips defended the trip to the council, saying that she doesn’t know how to best invest the fund’s more than $11 billion in assets and needs — in addition to advice from the board’s paid advisers — to “bounce ideas off academics” to find out how.

She said she’s worried about governments around the world creating a bubble in the stock market. Inflation is something else that she said scares her. She must travel to Hawaii for five days if she is expected to deal with those two challenges, she said.

SERS board members have been criticized by the state oversight committee for more than a month for their planned participation in a conference that no other pension board’s members are attending. The travel was budgeted for $11,000 for three board members. One has since backed out because of health concerns.

The pension fund’s board met last month and voted against lawmakers’ advice to cancel the trip and adopt a new travel policy. That move led state lawmakers on the oversight committee to threaten “legislative options” that would force SERS to adopt policies.

After what they called passionate testimony from Phillips yesterday, lawmakers still do not think she needs to go to Hawaii to do her job. Phillips took heat for being surprised when she was told that Ohio State University may offer similar seminars.

“For you to be surprised ... I’m surprised at that,” said Rep. Kirk Schuring, a Republican from Canton and member of the oversight panel. “Stay right here in the Buckeye State.”

Beverly Woolridge, the board’s chairwoman and an Akron City Schools employee, said the travel might not be necessary because members are to govern the way money is spent, not be responsible for knowing the ins and outs of the financial system.

“(The RSC) gave good advice today,” Woolridge said. “We should adhere to what they’re suggesting.”

SERS board members spent $160,000 on travel expenses in 2012, more than the other four pension funds combined. Rep. Lynn Wachtmann, a Republican from Napoleon and chairman of the retirement council, said that calls for policy changes at the fund.

“We’ve kind of beat this to death,” said Sen. Charleta B. Tavares of Columbus, one of two Democrats on the state panel. “Take a look at the other pension systems, look at what is considered usual and customary, and have a travel policy that’s consistent or at least within the same parameters as the other pension systems.”

<i>Joshua Jamerson is a fellow in Ohio University’s E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau. Follow him on Twitter @JoshJame.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-10T14:47:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bill seeks more details on bond issuances on ballot</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=386</link>
<dc:creator>By Sara Jerde (sjerde@dispatch.com)
The Columbus Dispatch</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=386</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ohio’s local governments soon might be required to give voters more information about their bond issuances in an effort to improve transparency, officials said.

A bill introduced by Rep. Kristina Roegner, R-Hudson, would require municipalities, counties and townships to specify additional information on the ballot for general-obligation bonds, including the total amount of outstanding debt, the amount of debt per capita and the amount of debt if the issue passes.

“When it comes to issues like government transparency, this is not a Democratic or Republican issue. This is an issue about increasing government transparency for taxpayers,” Ohio Treasurer Josh Mandel said at a news conference yesterday. He collaborated with Roegner on the bill.

Currently, the ballot for a bond issuance must include the date of issuance, the estimated rate of interest, terms of the bond and whether a tax would be necessary to pay for it.

“There are always those voters that actually read the language when they get (to the polls). Even if it’s available other places, having real clarity is just helpful,” said Catherine Turcer of Common Cause Ohio, a government-watchdog group.

The bill, which will be introduced today, also would force government entities to announce the debt issue online 45 days before an election. Governing entities currently are required to post bond issues in a newspaper 10 days before the election.

“This is going to help Ohioans make more-informed decisions,” said Roegner at the news conference.

<i>Sara Jerde is a fellow in Ohio University’s E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau. Follow her on Twitter @SaraJerde.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-10T12:57:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Republicans want bond issues more transparent on ballot</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=385</link>
<dc:creator>By Rex Santus (rsantus@plaind.com)
The Cleveland Plain Dealer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=385</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[COLUMBUS, Ohio – A Republican-backed bill would require governments and schools in Ohio to disclose more information about their debt when asking voters to approve bond issues.

Communities and schools often use bond issues to finance capital improvements. If passed, the bill would require public institutions to divulge information about their outstanding debt, including figures detailing debt obligations for each taxpayer, on the ballot when the issues are up for a vote.

"Information that we believe the voters need will be: How much current debt exists? How much outstanding debt is there? And what does that mean on a per-capita basis?" said Rep. Kristina Roegner, a Hudson Republican sponsoring the legislation, at a Tuesday news conference. "That's what we do as individuals, as families. When we need to borrow some money, we consider how much debt ... we already have."

Under the proposal, current debt information, as well as new estimates on outstanding debt and per-capita burdens, must be included on any ballots, legislation or notices pertaining to government bond issues. Roegner said the bill would also mandate that communities post this information online.

In Ohio, a political subdivision can put a bond issue up for vote only if it includes information regarding the need and purpose of the bond, as well as the principal amount, estimated interest rate and length of the bond. Language must also detail if there is a need to levy a tax to finance the bond. There is, however, no current requirement for disclosure of outstanding debt.

"This is all about transparency," said Republican state Treasurer Josh Mandel, who collaborated with Roegner on the bill, at the news conference. "When citizens are going to the ballot box ... they have a right to know what they're voting on. They have a right to know the full picture of debt."

Catherine Turcer, a policy analyst with Common Cause Ohio, said voters often think of bond issues as "magic money," and the legislation would have a positive impact by further informing the public of where their money goes. She said clarity is always a good thing.

Damon Asbury, director of legislative services for the Ohio School Boards Association, expressed trepidation about the legislation, saying more language could further complicate an already muddled balloting system. Despite this, he said it probably would not affect whether or not bond issues are passed.

"I think the average voter is going to go in there with his or her mind already made up. Maybe it's too much information," Asbury said. "On the other hand, I can't really in good conscience say that the public should not know all this data. Is that the best vehicle for it? Is there some other way?"

Communities seeking bond issues must disclose information via a newspaper notice at least 10 days in advance. The bill would require local boards of elections to publish all information -- including debt statistics -- on their websites at least 45 days prior to an election.

Mandel disputed the idea that information on outstanding debt would stymie passage of bond issues. He said that it would stimulate voter intelligence in Ohio, and that taxpayers would still be willing to support projects considered worthwhile.

"I think when you give citizens the opportunity to have as much information as possible, it just means that they're more equipped and better informed in making that decision," Mandel said. "I don't think it has a necessarily positive or negative impact; I think it will just have an informative impact."

Although lawmakers have touted the measure as a move toward greater transparency, Ohio Democratic Party Chairman Chris Redfern said Mandel is being hypocritical, citing the state treasurer's failed run for the United States Senate.

"This past year, Josh Mandel benefitted from more than $30 million in secretly funded attack ads while neglecting his duties as state treasurer," Redfern said in a statement. "Our treasurer is one of the biggest hypocrites in all of Ohio when it comes to matters of transparency, and Ohioans still know that Josh Mandel is a politician we just can't trust."

<i>Rex Santus is a Kent State University journalism student and a fellow in The E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau at Ohio University.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-10T01:07:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>DeWine panel suggests foster-care changes</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=383</link>
<dc:creator>By Sara Jerde (sjerde@dispatch.com)
The Columbus Dispatch</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=383</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine is asking for changes in the state’s foster-care system to make life “more normal” for the children in the system and easier on the families that bring them home.

DeWine announced the recommendations yesterday by the Foster Care Advisory group after members attended eight public hearings throughout the state for more than a year, getting feedback about the foster-care system, which has about 12,000 kids.

The advisory group — made up of foster-care advocates, judges and prosecutors, among others — was formed soon after a 2-year-old Cincinnati boy was beaten to death by his father after returning to his birth parents from foster care.

The suggestions include creating a central registry for medical records for children in foster care; inviting children in foster care to attend their court hearings when they are of an appropriate age; and narrowing the Planned Permanent Living Arrangements statute, which requires foster parents to reunify children with their birth parents.

“These are thoughtful, pragmatic solutions,” DeWine said. “Young people in foster care are often not allowed to do normal kid activities, such as spending the night at a friend’s house, and the reason they can’t do that is because they’re in foster care.”

Sen. Peggy Lehner, R-Kettering, and Rep. Dorothy Pelanda, R-Marysville, announced yesterday that they will offer a bill to address some of the recommendations. Which ones will be included is unknown, as the bill is being drafted.

“We will move swiftly to propose this legislation. No doubt these recommendations will only serve as the beginning (to foster-care reform),” Lehner said.

DeWine also announced $3 million for state foster-care programs. The money will be taken from Ohio’s National Mortgage Settlement — $2 million to start new Ohio Court-Appointed Special Advocate programs and $1 million to Ohio Reach, which helps children in foster care pursue higher education.

<i>Sara Jerde is a fellow in Ohio University’s E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau. Follow her on Twitter @SaraJerde.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-09T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Human-trafficking bill would toughen penalties in Ohio</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=384</link>
<dc:creator>By Rex Santus (rsantus@plaind.com)
The Cleveland Plain Dealer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=384</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[COLUMBUS, Ohio — EleSondra De Romano says she was first trafficked when she was 11 years old.

That is two years before the average trafficking victim is forced into so-called modern slavery, according to Rep. Teresa Fedor, a Toledo Democrat who is sponsoring legislation she said would reduce "consumer demand" for human trafficking.

Trafficking victims are often forced into prostitution, Fedor said Monday at a news conference where De Romano also spoke. Fedor said her bill would curb demand for trafficked prostitutes by invoking stricter and broader penalties for offenders.

"The worst criminals in our community are dealing in drugs, guns and girls," Fedor said. "And girls are the most profitable."

The measure would lengthen the statute of limitations for human trafficking by 14 years, as well as eliminate a requirement, in cases involving minors, that force or coercion be proven in trafficking prosecutions. The legislation would also criminalize the purchase of sex-for-hire advertisements that include a depiction of a minor, among numerous other provisions.

Fedor predicts sweeping bipartisan support for the bill, which has 53 cosponsors. The offices of Republican Speaker William G. Batchelder and Attorney General Mike DeWine also confirmed support for the legislation.

The proposal piggybacks on a bill Fedor sponsored in 2012. The legislature widely supported the law, which provides havens for trafficking victims and increased penalties for traffickers.

Fedor said it is important to revisit and strengthen trafficking laws because it is an always-evolving practice that is more common than people may realize. Fedor's hometown, Toledo, is often cited as a hub for sex trafficking, and the new legislation contains an emergency clause that would apply the bill immediately to Toledo.

"This is a pretty tragic situation happening in your own state and your own backyards," Fedor said. "It comes in many forms and fashions. It's like a chameleon. As soon as they figure out that we've figured out their scheme, they've moved, and they've changed into something else."

De Romano, of Toledo, is now an anti-trafficking advocate. At Monday's news conference, she implored lawmakers to continue their support of trafficking victims, saying preventive measures could be the savior of many Ohio children.

"It's very important that this legislation get passed," De Romano said. "Had this been around when I was being trafficked ... a whole lot of pimps probably would not be doing the things they are doing now."

<i>Rex Santus is a Kent State University journalism student and a fellow in The E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau at Ohio University.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-08T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>To no avail, the Ohio Retirement Council again has urged board members of one of Ohio’s public-pension funds to reconsider trav</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=388</link>
<dc:creator>By Rex Santus (rsantus@plaind.com)
The Cleveland Plain Dealer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=388</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[COLUMBUS, Ohio — Gov. John Kasich's plan to tax less of Ohioans' income and more of the products and services they use has re-ignited a debate over what is the fairest way for a state to tax its citizens.

Is it better to have a so-called progressive tax, in which the wealthy pay a greater share of their incomes, or a regressive tax that is applied uniformly, but has a greater impact on the poor?

That debate is going on around the country as Ohio and nine other states — Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Wisconsin — are entertaining proposals to either drastically cut or altogether discontinue income taxes.

"That's something that's happening in more states at one time than we've ever seen before," said Josh Culling, an economist with Americans for Tax Reform, a conservative tax advocacy group. "It's sort of a two-prong thing: one, Ohio is already sort of competitively behind the states that don't levy a personal income tax; and two, if they do nothing now, they're going to fall further behind."

Those who favor cutting income taxes say it makes a state more attractive to businesses. With businesses come jobs, money and growth. So what's the problem?

Critics say shifting away from income taxes and toward sales taxes puts a greater burden on poor families, who would pay a higher percentage of their incomes to taxes than wealthy ones. Supporters counter that lower-income people would ultimately benefit from the economic growth encouraged by an income tax cut.

The Tax Foundation, a business-backed group that studies tax issues, says the debate can be whittled down to two words: Texas envy.

"Texas, by at least most accounts, seems to be doing better than most states in the current recession: lower unemployment, more job growth, higher incomes," said Joseph Henchman, an economist working with the Tax Foundation. "A lot of businesses are going" to Texas. "You want them to come to your state."

Texas is one of seven states that imposes no income tax, but it never had an income tax to begin with. Only one state has ever abolished an income tax — Alaska back in 1979, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

The Lone Star State rakes in more than half of its state budget with a broad sales tax, according to Mike Reissig, associate deputy comptroller for Texas. While most states fill that remainder with an income tax, Texas has no need because, aside from Alaska, it is the country's largest producer of oil, making its severance taxes on natural resources a big money generator.

Rich Lowrie, the brains behind former Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain's 9-9-9 tax plan, said following in the steps of states like Texas would strengthen Ohio's economy.

(Ohio, under Gov. Bob Taft, in 2005 approved a 21 percent cut to the state’s income tax rates.)

Phasing from income tax to sales tax would shift the tax burden from Ohio's producers to its consumers, Lowrie said.

"I think what's good about what the governor's trying to accomplish is that, number one, production is what drives the economy, not consumption," Lowrie said. "If somebody doesn't believe that, we could send him to a deserted island where they are the island's only inhabitant and could say, 'Go ahead and consume. Drive that economy.' And they'll quickly learn that they have to produce something first before they consume it."

On the flip side, the state of Montana is Texas' opposite. Montana has never had a sales tax, but it does impose a progressive income tax. The state stipulates in its constitution that, if a sales tax were implemented, the rate would never exceed 4 percent, but voters have shown little interest in adopting a sales tax. The last time it went up for a vote was in the 1990s, and two-thirds of voters rejected the move, said Gene Walborn of Montana's revenue department.

Matthew Henry, an assistant professor of economics at Cleveland State University, said it is difficult to justify a progressive tax solely on the basis of economic benefit, but supporters would argue that it is fair to tax wealthier people at higher rates than those with low incomes.

Henry also cited an economic principle called "marginal value" in explaining that although progressive taxes require high-income families to pay more money at higher rates, the richer sacrifice less happiness while spending money because they have more money to spare.

Similar to Texas, Walborn said Montana accrues a big portion of its general budget through severance taxes on coal, metal mines and natural gases. Still, the biggest slice of its revenue is generated through its income tax.

"I'm not sure there's any deep reason why Montana has an income tax instead of a sales tax, but I think there is some parts of it that kind of make sense," said Kim Rueben, an economist with the Urban Institute, a nonpartisan think tank based in Washington, D.C. "Having an income tax is kind of nice in the fact that, in general, people get a bigger federal deduction from it. If you have higher levels of disparity of income with people across the state, I think you get more of a bang for the buck."

Kasich has proposed increasing Ohio's relatively low severance tax on drillers, but Rueben said Ohio cannot be compared to Texas or Montana in this way because it simply does not have the natural resources available to make up for a large, broad-based tax.

"Places like Oklahoma and Louisiana might be in a circumstance to cut back in a way that seems hard for me to believe that Kansas, Missouri and Ohio really can," she said.

Kansas' tax reform proposal is far more drastic than Ohio's, Rueben said, but it is the perfect illustration of why Texas envy is not a legitimate reason to cut income tax.

Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback has proposed a "glide path" to no income tax in his state, and, like Kasich's plan in Ohio, he suggests a widely expanded sales tax to pick up the slack.

The Kansas Legislative Research Department has estimated that cuts to Kansas' income tax, which took the state from a three-rate to two-rate system while simultaneously slicing fees by significant margins, will culminate in a $910 million deficit.

"There are specific circumstances that kind of lead to different tax structures in some states," Rueben said. "Basically, Alaska got rid of its income tax because it was raising enough money through natural resource taxes. Part of the reason Texas cannot have an income tax is because they have a lot of their money coming in through extractions and other taxes."

Culling, with Americans for Tax Reform, rebuffed Rueben's ideas, insisting there is more evidence suggesting that abolishing income taxes fosters growth. He said opponents to eliminating income taxes are digging for reasons to discredit an empirically supported formula.

"Texas certainly does have energy resources; Florida — tourism, sure," Culling said, "But you know if you look at the seven states that don't levy an income tax, on the whole ... it's night and day."

Henchman, with the Tax Foundation, said it is futile to debate the "ideal" tax system because the diversity of the United States often makes it difficult to compare economies in an apples-to-apples manner.

"That is one of the great things that I like about living in the United States," Henchman said. "Every state has a different mix of strengths and weaknesses. States should aim to build on that."

Plain Dealer Data Analysis Editor Rich Exner contributed to this story.

<i>Rex Santus is a Kent State University journalism student and a fellow in The E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau at Ohio University.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-07T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ono Appointed to Advisory Board</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=396</link>
<dc:creator>By Lance Lambert
The News Record</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=396</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[University of Cincinnati President Santa Ono now has influence over funding for innovation and job growth in Ohio, following his new appointment from the governor.

Gov. John Kasich appointed Ono to serve as an advisory board member for Ohio Third Frontier — a technology-based economic development initiative that was created to help Ohio become competitive in the new century.

Ono will serve on the 16-member board that oversees how funds for technology projects are allocated.

He is one of five representatives from the higher education field on the board, while nine seats are for business representatives and the other two are for Ohio House Speaker and Senate President.

“I am very honored to have been appointed to the Third Frontier Advisory Board for Ohio by Governor John Kasich,” Ono said on Twitter Monday.

Ono’s appointment could be beneficial for southwest Ohio, which has not received as much funding for projects as the rest of the state.

As of 2012, the region was awarded $118 million for projects, while Third Frontier spent $1.1 billion statewide since being created.

Third Frontier has invested in various local companies and organizations. Cintrifuse, an organization created to link entrepreneurs with businesses and research institutions, is one of the local companies aided by Third Frontier.  

Cintrifuse also received $10 million from UC to support promising local startups.

Ohio voters supported Third Frontier’s creation, allowing the state to issue bonds totaling $2.6 billion for its inception.

Started under former Gov. Bob Taft, the group invested into projects for the Hamilton County Business Center and Cincinnati Children’s Computational Medicine Center.

Ono will join Mark Peterson, director of Global Business Development at Procter &amp; Gamble, as the only southwest Ohio members of the advisory board.

<i>Lance Lambert is a fellow in Ohio University’s E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau. He studies journalism at the University of Cincinnati.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-07T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Women’s group objects to religious exemption on covering contraceptives</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=382</link>
<dc:creator>By Sara Jerde (sjerde@dispatch.com)
The Columbus Dispatch</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=382</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Carole DePaola doesn’t remember when or where she contracted the sexually transmitted disease HPV, but she can easily recall the Pap smear showing that the virus had caused cancerous cells to grow in her uterus.

DePaola, now 70, says women don’t have to go through what she did. There’s a vaccine — a shot that might not be covered under a proposed exemption to President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act.

At a news conference put on yesterday by the Ohio Democratic Women’s Caucus, DePaola urged Gov. John Kasich to oppose the requested exemption. It would allow private employers who have religious objections to contraceptives to refuse coverage for their employees.

“If I had that (HPV) vaccine, I wouldn’t be standing here today. Vaccines need to be had by young kids, and if they’re not, HPV will increase more and more,” said DePaola, who is the caucus’ secretary.

The exemption was requested last week by Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine and attorneys general from 12 other states in a petition to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

“This doesn’t involve us. It’s an attorney-general thing at this point,” said Kasich spokesman Rob Nichols. “They can bring up Obama — he’d be a better one to comment on this. But it doesn’t involve us.”

An exemption might jeopardize coverage for cancer screenings and birth control, said Liz Brown, the caucus’s deputy executive director.

“If you mess with women’s health care, prepare for women to turn against you at the polls,” Brown warned DeWine.

She said the same applies to Kasich.

“Will you stand (with) Mike DeWine or will you stand up and protect women’s health?”

<i>Sara Jerde is a fellow in Ohio University’s E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau. Follow her on Twitter @SaraJerde.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-03T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Critics say DeWine's contraception letter dangerous for women</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=381</link>
<dc:creator>By Rex Santus (rsantus@plaind.com)
The Cleveland Plain Dealer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=381</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[COLUMBUS, Ohio -- The Ohio Democratic Women's Caucus and other groups have blasted Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine for his support of exempting private employers, if they object on religious grounds, from providing contraceptive coverage to employees.

The caucus held a news conference Tuesday to criticize a letter, sent by DeWine and 13 other attorneys general, imploring the Obama administration to broaden a contraceptive coverage exemption to all conscientious objectors.

The exemption is included in a proposed mandate of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, which would require all non-religious employers to provide preventive coverage. The attorneys general said the measure would violate many employers' religious freedoms.

Liz Brown, deputy executive director of the Ohio Democratic Party, said the move not only threatens a woman's right to birth control but her access to cancer screenings and HPV vaccines.

She said the attorney general is turning his back on women voters and urged Ohio's elected officials to not sit quietly while conservative politicians move to restrict women's rights.

Planned Parenthood has also expressed concern about DeWine's actions, saying a woman's access to contraception should not hinge on her employer's personal beliefs.

"Attorney General DeWine and the CEOs he is supporting don't have to take birth control, and they don't have to pay for it," said Stephanie Kight, president of Planned Parenthood Advocates of Ohio, in a statement. "But they should comply with this common sense law that will make birth control available to any woman who needs it."

Kellie Copeland, executive director NARAL Pro-Choice Ohio, echoed Brown's concern that DeWine's efforts could hinder the availability of mammograms or maternity care.

In an interview Tuesday, DeWine dismissed the criticisms, saying it is an issue of religious rights.

He called assertions that his letter could affect women's access to mammograms, maternity care and HPV vaccines "the most ridiculous thing in the world," adding that the proposed Obamacare stipulations would violate laws that protect religious expression.

"I'm not going to respond to their political comments. This is not a political issue, at all," DeWine said. "This is an issue, frankly, of religious freedom. I think my comments ... are consistent with the over 200-year history of this country and religious freedom."

<i>Rex Santus is a Kent State University journalism student and a fellow in The E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau at Ohio University.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-02T21:55:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tainted park cleaned for summer campers</title>
<link>http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=380</link>
<dc:creator>By Ryan Clark (ryanclark@dispatch.com)
The Columbus Dispatch</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrippsjschool.org/bureau/article.php?id=380</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Columbus officials hope to clean up a site contaminated with mercury before the city’s popular summer camps open this year.

Contractors recently finished scraping about 140 cubic yards of contaminated soil from the site at Indian Village, a Columbus Recreation and Parks facility on the west side of the Scioto River near Griggs Dam.

A Boy Scout troop found the silvery toxic metal while digging a fire ring in May 2009.

The city fenced off the area and worked with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency to remove about 16 cubic yards of contaminated soil — and about 4 pounds of mercury — in June that year, said Laura Young Mohr, a spokeswoman for the Columbus Department of Public Utilities.

Tests showed that the contamination did not pose a risk to the water supply in the nearby reservoir.

“We’re taking the bad stuff out and putting good soil back in,” Mohr said.

Officials suspect the mercury came from an above-ground water tank that was part of an old wastewater-treatment plant there before the 1950s, said Erin Strouse, spokeswoman for the Ohio EPA.

Exposure to elemental mercury, such as that found in the park, often comes through mercury vapor and can lead to mental and physical problems, pregnancy complications and even death in large amounts, the U.S. EPA says.

Consultants who tested the ground after the first cleanup recommended that the city remove additional soil. Tests of the soil, now piled up and covered on a driveway, will determine whether the mercury levels are high enough to require that it be taken to a licensed hazardous-material landfill or whether it can be recycled.In January, the Columbus City Council approved spending about $76,000 for the second phase, bringing the total cost of the project to about $540,000. The contaminated soil should be replaced by the end of April, the city says.

As of now, camps are scheduled for this summer, “but we always err on the side of caution,” said Alan McKnight, recreation and parks director.

<i>Ryan Clark is a fellow in Ohio University's E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Statehouse News Bureau. Follow him on Twitter @RyanGClark.</i>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2013-04-02T14:28:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>